Friday, August 30, 2019

FIVE THINGS - Val McDermid's A dark domain


So herewith my second "five things" book review. This time it is a crime book - a genre I have vociferously for my entire reading life! To this day I recall that the first book I read which was more text than pictures was The clue of the crossword cipher by Carolyn Keene - a Nancy Drew mystery. I read that about 39 years ago! I was no wiser as to what a cipher was by the end of the book as at the start, but I have been a firm and fast fan of crime ever since. I can even tell you which of Agatha Christie's books I read first: Murder is Easy. I watched a movie on TV starring Bill Bixby. Do not ask me how I remember these things, with somethings my brain is like velcro. Not with others, but anyway, to the book at hand.

This is my second Val McDermid, and also the second I am reading which featured Karen Pirie. Yes, I am trying to read crime books featuring the same sleuths in order.

Here are my "five things":
1. I don't suppose it is particularly surprising that what seems to be two separate cases that Detective Inspector Pirie investigates during the first part of the book at some point must converge. My favourite books are those which surprise me in one or other way. How these two stories intersect was unfortunately not that, even for the ever so slight twist in the tale in the end. This does not mean I didn't enjoy the book, I did. Part of the joy is precisely to try to predict these things.

2. There are parts of the story which were a tad melodramatic. Such is life however and again, the book was still very enjoyable and I would recommend it.

3. There was a bit of inconsistency in the story. I suspect that I am on the outlook for such much more than I was before and this was the first time I really noticed one such case. It was a necessary device for the story, but it was nevertheless an inconsistency. (Ask me in the comments if you are curious what I identify as this. I am trying not to write any spoilers for some reason).

4. I enjoy Karen Pirie as a character. She is intelligent and yet I am not sure whether it is her self-image or whether she really is particularly dumpy physically, it is nevertheless she is a character I would enjoying meeting in the real world. That is not something I experience all that often. I am reminded of Elly Griffith's character Ruth Galloway, who is also physically not model material. I am not sure I enjoy her personality enough, but it is useful that there are non-Barbie doll (Nancy Drew?) slim and slender heroines in such books. And (warning: spoiler ahead): Karen gets her man.

5. All in all, as I have said above: a sufficiently satisfying book. And ultimately that is what counts.

Sunday, August 18, 2019

FIVE THINGS - Rocannon's world by Ursula le Guin

I read a fair amount of books (so far 65 this year) and have lately complained a bit about books which I have not enjoyed. However I enjoy the vast majority of what I read, so am going to try a "Five things about..." books that I read as a means of reviewing them. My first will be Rocannon's world by Ursula le Guin.

I loved it. For whatever reason the only le Guin's I have actually read thus far have been the first four Earthsea books. Given, however, that I have the last three years been rediscovering and immersing myself in the science fiction and fantasy genres, it was simply a matter of time before Ursula le Guin came up again. This was her first full length novel, published in 1966. 

So herewith, five things:

1. The start reminded me a bit of Doris Lessing's Re. Colonised Planet 5: Shikasta (published 1979). I tried to read the book earlier this year, but despite Lessing's as always, beautiful prose, did not manage. The ethnological approach was reminiscent. Le Guin's book however has an actual storyline, and it probably does not hurt that it is much, much shorter.

2. One of my favourite things about le Guin's books is that a key people group or character is always dark-skinned. In this case the Angyar, to whom the heroes in the book belong, as well as, the original Liuar peoples - as described in this quote towards the end of the book: "“Gold-haired, dark-skinned, a tall-people, the old stock of which the Angyar were only a tribe that long ago had wandered north by sea: these were the Liuar, the Earthlords, living since before the memory of any race here in the foothills of the mountains and the rolling plains to the south.”: It is accurate given what we know about human origins, and if representation matters, then this matters.

 3. I love that this book is a fusion of fantasy (with animals such as windsteeds) and science fiction (interplanetary travel).

4. The good guys win. Even if an entire people group is surgically obliterated. Perhaps a bit simplistic, but it is a novel of less than 140 pages from 1966,

5. Favourite lines:

"“swearing destruction and extinction to the enemy in a torrent of metaphor and a thunder of hyperbole”

"“This was no place for an ethnologist of forty-three.”

Just magic.


Saturday, August 10, 2019

Poetry appreciation: Du må ikke sove

av Arnulf Øverland

(my emphasis)


Jeg våknet en natt av en underlig drøm,
det var som en stemme talte til meg,
fjern som en underjordisk strøm
og jeg reiste meg opp: Hva er det du vil meg?

Du må ikke sove! Du må ikke sove!
Du må ikke tro at du bare har drømt!
I går ble jeg dømt.
I natt har de reist skafottet i gården.
De henter meg klokken fem i morgen!

Hele kjelleren her er full,
og alle kaserner har kjeller ved kjeller.
Vi ligger og venter i stenkalde celler,
vi ligger og råtner i mørke hull!

Vi vet ikke selv hva vi ligger og venter,
og hvem som kan bli den neste de henter.
Vi stønner, vi skriker – men kan dere høre?
Kan dere absolutt ingenting gjøre?

Ingen får se oss.
Ingen får vite hva der skal skje oss.
Ennå mer:
Ingen kan tro hva her daglig skjer!

Du mener det ikke kan være sant,
så onde kan ikke mennesker være.
Det fins da vel skikkelig folk iblant?
Bror, du har ennå meget å lære!

Man sa: Du skal gi ditt liv om det kreves.
Og nå har vi gitt det – forgjeves, forgjeves!
Verden har glemt oss! Vi er bedratt!
Du må ikke sove mer i natt!

Du må ikke gå til ditt kjøpmannskap
og tenke på hva som gir vinning og tap!
Du må ikke skylde på åker og fe
og at du har mer enn nok med det!

Du må ikke sitte trygt i ditt hjem
og si: Det er sørgelig, stakkars dem!
Du må ikke tåle så inderlig vel
den urett som ikke rammer deg selv! 

Jeg roper med siste pust av min stemme:
Du har ikke lov til å gå der og glemme!

Tilgi dem ikke, de vet hva de gjør!
De puster på hatets og ondskapens glør!
De liker å drepe, de frydes ved jammer,
de ønsker å se vår verden i flammer!
De ønsker å drukne oss alle i blod!
Tror du det ikke? Du vet det jo!

Du vet jo at skolebarn er soldater,
som stimer med sang over torg og gater,
og oppglødd av mødrenes fromme svik
vil verge sitt land og gå i krig!

Du kjenner det nedrige folkebedrag
med heltemot og med tro og ære –
du vet at en helt, det vil barnet være,
du vet han vil vifte med sabel og flagg!

Og så skal han ut i en skur av stål
og henge igjen i en piggtrådvase
og råtne for Hitlers ariske rase!
Du vet det er menneskets mening og mål!

Jeg skjønte det ikke. Nå er det for sent.
Min dom er rettferdig, min straff er fortjent.
Jeg trodde på framgang, jeg trodde på fred,
arbeid, samhold, kjærlighet!
Men den som ikke vil dø i en flokk,
får prøve alene, på bøddelens blokk!


Jeg roper i mørket – å, kunne du høre!
Det er en eneste ting å gjøre:
Verg deg, mens du har frie hender!
Frels dine barn! Europa brenner!

*
Jeg skaket av frost. Jeg fikk på meg klær.
Ute var glitrende stjernevær.
Bare en ulmende stripe i øst
varslet det samme som drømmens røst.

Dagen bakom jordens rand
steg med et skjær av blod og brann,
steg med en angst så åndeløs
at det var som om selve stjernene frøs!

Jeg tenkte: Nå er det noe som hender.
– Vår tid er forbi – Europa brenner!

Written in 1936
 

Some impressions after my recent trip to the US

I just returned from a two week holiday in the USA. I have travelled to New York a few times, and once to visit a friend in Washington D.C. My motivation was a longstanding desire to see redwoods. As I am not getting any younger, and have a well paying job, and am not afraid of travelling alone, I decided to "just do it" and to travel to California. During those two weeks I was in San Francisco and the Sequoia, Kings canyon, Yosemite and Redwood national parks. The nature was simply phenomenal, but that is not what I intend to reflect on now. Rather, one of my motivations for this travel was a sort of to 'get it over and done with'. What I mean by that is that I am not particularly comfortable with the USA which I have become familiar with on the internet and in social media. I also have a personal notion not to visit countries which have particular politically oppressive practices. A sort of ethical tourism, if you will. I am cognizant that one cannot be too rigid on this standard as there are few countries which are not criticism-worthy (case in point: my own country of Norway and our deportation practices at present). The US, with their current actions to separate and intern children apart from their family is without a doubt on that list of dubious and unacceptable practices. So it was with a certain holding-my-nose that I undertook this trip. Hence the "get it over and done with" attitude.

I was however acutely aware that I do have a tendency to over-dramatise and certainly as I both think a great deal, do set myself up for both unnecessary fear. Thankfully, I am quite used to being disappointed. In fact, I live so much in my own mind that I have gone my entire life, waiting for that "racist situation" which I could respond to, and thus far been disappointed. Thus far, but I will revert to that.

Now while the physical beauty of California definitely lived up to my expectations and was, well, breathtaking, in an unironic sense, so unfortunately did the aspect of racism and other USian particularities. Bear in mind, furthermore, this was California, not Alabama nor Mississippi. So what was it that I stumbled across?

First, the homeless in San Francisco. I am used to seeing homeless people in Anglo countries. Poverty is by no means unique, but there are somehow always more homeless people on the streets of UK, Canada or the US than in other countries I have been in. San Francisco, however stands out. It did not help that my hotel was just on the streets of choice, but my practice of walking the cities I visit would anyway have exposed me to all of these. As I sit here, I still feel somewhat overwhelmed by the misery. I kept it at a distance there somehow. The last day I was there I was witness both to someone smoking crack as well as someone I suspect was about to take a snort of cocaine. What I could not fail to notice however, was that probably about nine of ten of the homeless were people of colour. 

That was all bad enough, but I also witnessed unambiguous white privilege-going-on-racism in action. An old white man who insisted that a black man in a Peet's Coffee was sitting in "his seat". I do not doubt he would have responded the same way had it not been person of colour, but it was a person of colour. Who was ready to dig in (and I was not surprised at that).  I made my feelings known to the white man (told him he was being an arsehole). Nevertheless I did not stay to see how it would turn out. I am at a loss even now to know how best I should have reacted, to be a true white ally. On the one hand, I am so emotional and am afraid of my own reactions, which are rarely useful. On the other, I am sorry that I did not at least wait a bit and make a fuss with the fact that the staff appeared to be taking the side of the white guy and not buy a coffee there.

This should haunt me for a while. I think I would need help (training?) to handle such situations in the future.

Anyway, you can imagine my relief to leave the city, whatever its charms. The next situation which arose however (so much for my anticipation that as usual I was over-dramatising in my own mind that more likely than not, I would not notice much, as is the case in most Western European countries I visit), was a car in the northern Californian city of Eureka. A red car of some kind, which had an affixed antenna-flagpole on it, with two fabric flags fluttering in the wind as it drove. One US flag (one sees enough of those in the US), but also my first Confederate flag. I wish I could have taken a picture at least, but I was myself driving. Someone went to the trouble of attaching that to their car. Wow. I know how I would feel when I see an old South African flag, and this is without a doubt even worse. I would feel the same way if I saw a Swastika flag.

It was sickening.

So the US lived up to my worst expectations I am sorry to say. It took me back to my childhood in apartheid South Africa.  😔

On guns...

Additionally, the last weekend before I left, I was trying to put petrol in the car and was struggling as most of the "gas pumps" require a card attached to a US zip code to do so. A man who heard me mention I was from Norway (he has family here) made conversation (and helped me with the petrol), and we had a short chat. It was the day after the El Paso and Dayton shootings and we got into a conversation about gun control. Turns out he was a hunting enthusiast and owns a mere 60 guns himself, including some so-called assault rifles (so much more humane for hunting he assured me). He could see there was a problem with access to guns in the US, and not an especially unpleasant guy at all. It occurred to me that as the owner of literally more than a thousand books, I could understand the attractions of collecting something you are fascinated with. (Let it not be said that I am unfair). Then again, sixty guns which have as their raison d'être to kill. It is not quite the same.

As it turns out, 55 people were killed by gun violence in the US the two weeks I was there, including the 22 in El Paso and the 10 in Dayton (source: https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/reports/mass-shooting).

Fifty five.

That is 3,9 people per day I was there. 

The nature was simply spectacular and worth the travel. As for the rest, what comes to mind is the assertion I see fairly regularly by leaders in the US when comment is being made about the concentration camps and the such on Twitter who assert: "This is not who we are".

This is exactly who you are.

To quote Bob Gass, a Northern Irish preacher I heard what must be almost twenty years ago: what is not acknowledged cannot be changed.